At JavaOne, Larry Ellison has made some very encouraging statements about
Oracle’s commitments to Java, JavaFX, and the mobile developer market. It
is certainly good news that Oracle (i.e., Larry) sees the significance of the
Java platform in its integrality. However, there are many misunderstandings
about the relationship between Java, JavaFX, and Android that even confuse
the new Java owner. Here are some clarifications.
1) JavaFX is NOT Java
Obviously, from a marketing standpoint, JavaFX is branded as Java; however,
technically JavaFX is a language by itself, which happens to be compiled into
Java bytecode and run on a Java VM. JavaFX is similar to Groovy or JRuby,
minus the dynamic part (see #2). For example, introspecting a JavaFX object
from Java requires some tricks since JavaFX Object/Class definitions do not
map directly to those of Java Object/Class. (Note: ... (more)
Ok, so, here are my thoughts on Ulitzer...
As a blogger, I focus on traffic and I spend quite a lot of time optimizing
my SEO.
Since the target audience of my articles is much greater than the reach of my
blog, Ulitzer is actually helping me increase my content reach.
Moreover, Ulitzer does it in a very fair way since links back to my posts or
other locations are without the evil "nofollow" - providing a nice SEO boost.
It also gives me some good metrics that are very useful data points on the
effectiveness of my blog articles.
And last but not least, it allows my article to appear... (more)
For quick scan, follow the bold words.
Although there is evidence that the two styles will converge in the future,
enterprise and consumer Web architecture and technology are quite different
today. If one talks to an enterprise application architect, he or she will
probably say that while consumer Web applications are cute, simple, and
sometimes useful, their architectures and technologies are merely a bunch of
scripts and hacks put together. If one talks to a consumer Web architect, she
or he will probably say that enterprise software is overly complex, often
unusable, and based... (more)
Mysterious, comforting, scary, and attractive are all possible adjectives to
describe a cloud. Interestingly enough, this is true of all kinds of clouds,
from the meteorological to the computing. During the last few years, we have
a seen a proliferation of clouds forming from every corner of the Internet.
Nowadays, it is very rare to see any Internet technology presentation without
at least a few clouds.
So is cloud computing simply vaporware, or something tangible?
While the name might be “buzzy”, cloud computing is in fact a real
phenomenon and does create great technological ... (more)
Software technologists tend to learn by oscillating. We never arrive directly
at the right solution; we just come closer to it by going back and forth. We
always think (or like to think) that our current solution is correct; only to
realize, some years later, that we overshot and need to take a few steps
back. The evolution of the software application model is a great example of
this syndrome. Every technologist knows about the three main application
model phases—Mainframe, Client/Server, and Web [1.0]—and many of them
think they know what the next phase will be. In fact, two mod... (more)